Theory of Legal Principles
Humberto Avila
āĻā§āĻĒā§āĻ¤ā§ ā§¨ā§Ļā§Ļā§ ¡ Law and Philosophy Library āĻāĻŋāĻ¤āĻžāĻĒ 81 ¡ Springer Science & Business Media
ā§Ģ.ā§Ļstar
ā§§ āĻāĻž āĻĒā§°ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ˛ā§āĻāĻ¨āĻžreport
āĻāĻŦā§āĻ
154
āĻĒā§āĻˇā§āĻ āĻž
reportāĻŽā§āĻ˛ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻā§°ā§ āĻĒā§°ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ˛ā§āĻāĻ¨āĻž āĻ¸āĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻĒāĻ¨ āĻā§°āĻž āĻšā§ā§ąāĻž āĻ¨āĻžāĻ  āĻ
āĻ§āĻŋāĻ āĻāĻžāĻ¨āĻ
āĻāĻ āĻāĻŦā§āĻāĻāĻ¨ā§° āĻŦāĻŋāĻˇā§ā§
This book intends to help understand and apply principles and rules better. Its target is to keep the distinction between principles and rules whereas structuring it on different foundations than those jurisprudence ordinarily employs. The first object of investigation is the phenomenon of interpretation in Law in order to understand that the classification of certain normative species as either principles or rules depends in the first place on axiological connections that are not ready prior to the interpretation process that unveils them. Then, a definition of principles is proposed, aiming to understand what their unique characteristics are when compared to other norms of the legal order. Thirdly, the conditions for the application of principles and rules are examined, which are the normative applicative postulates. It will be shown, on one hand, that principles not only explicit values, but also set forth precise species of behaviors, though indirectly; on the other hand, the creation of conducts by rules is also to be weighed, even though the behavior set forth in advance may be overcome, depending on the accomplishment of a few requirements. That will surpass both the mere praise of values, which does not create behaviors, and the automatic application of rules. A model is proposed to explain the normative species, which includes structured weighing on the application process while encompassing substantive criteria of justice in its argument, through the analytical reconstruction of the concrete use of normative postulates, especially those of reasonableness and proportionality. All of that is done with a focus on the ability of intersubjective control of the argumentation, which often degenerates into capricious decisionism.
āĻŽā§āĻ˛ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻā§°ā§ āĻĒā§°ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ˛ā§āĻāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻš
ā§Ģ.ā§Ļ
ā§§ āĻāĻž āĻĒā§°ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ˛ā§āĻāĻ¨āĻž
āĻāĻ āĻāĻŦā§āĻāĻāĻ¨āĻ āĻŽā§āĻ˛ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻā§°āĻ
āĻāĻŽāĻžāĻ āĻāĻĒā§āĻ¨āĻžā§° āĻŽāĻ¤āĻžāĻŽāĻ¤ āĻāĻ¨āĻžāĻāĻāĨ¤
āĻĒāĻĸāĻŧāĻžā§° āĻ¨āĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻĻā§āĻļāĻžā§ąāĻ˛ā§
āĻ¸ā§āĻŽāĻžā§°ā§āĻāĻĢâāĻ¨ āĻā§°ā§ āĻā§āĻŦāĻ˛ā§āĻ
Android āĻā§°ā§ iPad/iPhoneā§° āĻŦāĻžāĻŦā§ Google Play Books āĻāĻĒāĻā§ āĻāĻ¨āĻˇā§āĻāĻ˛ āĻā§°āĻāĨ¤ āĻ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻ¯āĻŧāĻāĻā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻ¯āĻŧāĻāĻžā§ąā§ āĻāĻĒā§āĻ¨āĻžā§° āĻāĻāĻžāĻāĻŖā§āĻā§° āĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ā§ āĻāĻŋāĻāĻ āĻšāĻ¯āĻŧ āĻā§°ā§ āĻāĻĒā§āĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ¯'āĻ¤ā§ āĻ¨āĻžāĻĨāĻžāĻāĻ āĻ¤'āĻ¤ā§āĻ āĻā§āĻ¨ā§ āĻ
āĻĄāĻŋāĻ
'āĻŦā§āĻ āĻ
āĻ¨āĻ˛āĻžāĻāĻ¨ āĻŦāĻž āĻ
āĻĢāĻ˛āĻžāĻāĻ¨āĻ¤ āĻļā§āĻ¨āĻŋāĻŦāĻ˛ā§ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻŋāĻ§āĻž āĻĻāĻŋāĻ¯āĻŧā§āĨ¤
āĻ˛ā§āĻĒāĻāĻĒ āĻā§°ā§ āĻāĻŽā§āĻĒāĻŋāĻāĻāĻžā§°
āĻāĻĒā§āĻ¨āĻŋ āĻāĻŽā§āĻĒāĻŋāĻāĻāĻžā§°ā§° ā§ąā§āĻŦ āĻŦā§āĻ°āĻžāĻāĻāĻžā§° āĻŦā§āĻ¯ā§ąāĻšāĻžā§° āĻā§°āĻŋ Google PlayāĻ¤ āĻāĻŋāĻ¨āĻž āĻ
āĻĄāĻŋāĻ
'āĻŦā§āĻāĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻš āĻļā§āĻ¨āĻŋāĻŦ āĻĒāĻžā§°ā§āĨ¤
āĻ-ā§°ā§āĻĄāĻžā§° āĻā§°ā§ āĻ
āĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ āĻĄāĻŋāĻāĻžāĻāĻ
Kobo eReadersā§° āĻĻā§°ā§ āĻ-āĻāĻŋā§āĻžāĻāĻšā§ā§° āĻĄāĻŋāĻāĻžāĻāĻāĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻšāĻ¤ āĻĒā§āĻŋāĻŦāĻ˛ā§, āĻāĻĒā§āĻ¨āĻŋ āĻāĻāĻž āĻĢāĻžāĻāĻ˛ āĻĄāĻžāĻāĻ¨āĻ˛âāĻĄ āĻā§°āĻŋ āĻ¸ā§āĻāĻā§ āĻāĻĒā§āĻ¨āĻžā§° āĻĄāĻŋāĻāĻžāĻāĻāĻ˛ā§ āĻ¸ā§āĻĨāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§°āĻŖ āĻā§°āĻŋāĻŦ āĻ˛āĻžāĻāĻŋāĻŦāĨ¤ āĻ¸āĻŽā§°ā§āĻĨāĻŋāĻ¤ āĻ-ā§°āĻŋāĻĄāĻžā§°āĻ˛ā§ āĻĢāĻžāĻāĻ˛āĻā§ āĻā§āĻ¨ā§āĻā§ āĻ¸ā§āĻĨāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§° āĻā§°āĻŋāĻŦ āĻāĻžāĻ¨āĻŋāĻŦāĻ˛ā§ āĻ¸āĻšāĻžāĻ¯āĻŧ āĻā§āĻ¨ā§āĻĻā§ā§°āĻ¤ āĻĨāĻāĻž āĻ¸āĻŦāĻŋāĻļā§āĻˇ āĻ¨āĻŋā§°ā§āĻĻā§āĻļāĻžā§ąāĻ˛ā§ āĻāĻžāĻāĻāĨ¤
