
Mitchell McQuinn
This is a book based on rhetoric, not science. Dawkins tries to find what is "plausible" and invents charming stories to convince the reader that he is right, irrespective of any evidence to the contrary. He has great faith in the ability of mutations to overcome information gaps in the genome despite there being no scientific evidence of such mutations. Mutations always represent information loss, and never add new information into the genetic code. It is an enjoyable read, but seriously flawed.
3 people found this review helpful