Prosody in Syntactic Encoding
Gerrit Kentner Β· Joost Kremers
07.2020β―Π³. Β· Linguistische Arbeiten ΠΠ½ΠΈΠ³Π° 573 Β· Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG
ΠΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½Π° ΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠ³Π°
339
Π‘ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠΈ
reportΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ·ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½Π΅ ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈ Β ΠΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅
ΠΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎ Π·Π° ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½Π° ΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠ³Π°
What is the role of prosody in the generation of sentence structure?
A standard notion holds that prosody results from mapping a hierarchical syntactic structure onto a linear sequence of words. A radically different view conceives of certain intonational features as integral components of the syntactic structure. Yet another conception maintains that prosody and syntax are parallel systems that mutually constrain each other to yield surface sentential form.
The different viewpoints reflect the various functions prosody may have: On the one hand, prosody is a signal to syntax, marking e.g. constituent boundaries. On the other hand, prosodic or intonational features convey meaning; the concept βintonational morphemeβ (as e.g. an exponent of information structural notions like topic or focus) puts prosody and intonation squarely into the syntactic representation.
A standard notion holds that prosody results from mapping a hierarchical syntactic structure onto a linear sequence of words. A radically different view conceives of certain intonational features as integral components of the syntactic structure. Yet another conception maintains that prosody and syntax are parallel systems that mutually constrain each other to yield surface sentential form.
The different viewpoints reflect the various functions prosody may have: On the one hand, prosody is a signal to syntax, marking e.g. constituent boundaries. On the other hand, prosodic or intonational features convey meaning; the concept βintonational morphemeβ (as e.g. an exponent of information structural notions like topic or focus) puts prosody and intonation squarely into the syntactic representation.
The proposals collected in this book tackle the intricate relationship of syntax and prosody in the encoding of sentences. The contributions build their cases on the basis of solid empirical evidence, adducing data from experiments or from the careful analysis of natural speech. The volume thus represents a state of the art survey of research on the syntax-phonology interface.
ΠΠ° Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠ°
Gerrit Kentner, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt a.M.; Joost Kremers, Univ. of Bielefeld, Germany.
ΠΡΠ΅Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½Π° ΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠ³Π°
ΠΠ°ΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π½ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠ²ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅.
ΠΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π·Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΎ
Π‘ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±Π»Π΅ΡΠΈ
ΠΠ½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ°ΠΉΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΡΠΎ Google Play ΠΠ½ΠΈΠ³ΠΈ Π·Π° Android ΠΈ iPad/iPhone. Π’ΠΎ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΠ½Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ° Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π° Π²ΠΈ ΠΈ Π²ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ²Π° Π΄Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ½Π»Π°ΠΉΠ½ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ»Π°ΠΉΠ½, ΠΊΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΎ ΠΈ Π΄Π° ΡΡΠ΅.
ΠΠ°ΠΏΡΠΎΠΏΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠΈ
ΠΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π° ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°ΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡ Google Play Π°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠ³ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π± Π±ΡΠ°ΡΠ·ΡΡΠ° Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΡΠ° ΡΠΈ.
ΠΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²Π°
ΠΠ° Π΄Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²Π° Ρ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎ, ΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ Kobo, ΡΡΡΠ±Π²Π° Π΄Π° ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ΅Π³Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΉΠ» ΠΈ Π΄Π° Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Ρ
Π²ΡΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎ ΡΠΈ. ΠΠ·ΠΏΡΠ»Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΡ, Π·Π° Π΄Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Ρ
Π²ΡΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΉΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄ΡΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ.
