
A Google user
Considering the time the book was published (1992) and the ongoing Japanese-American business relations this was probably a hot, controversial topic. It still might be. Were the details accurate? Maybe, but as a work of fiction the author need not be constrained to exactness, at least from my perspective. This would have been a four-star read but the delivery was at times excessive, repetitive, and could have otherwise been used for a thicker plot or more twists.
3 people found this review helpful

Carlos Garcia
- Flag inappropriate
- Show review history
I struggled to get into this book and it pains me. I love MC books and have recently become a huge fan. He has hits and misses, this one was a miss. I have it a 3.9/5 and it hurt to rank it so low. I am not complaining about "racism" or how it's a book "written for a specific time", such stupid reviews are simply small minded. The story moves, but it delves into too much detail at times and takes away from the story. It could have built up a stronger story with those wasted pages of details. Maybe even throw a better twist in there. This is absolutely no Disclosure (5/5 all day!), but it could have been better. It also hurt to see how stupid they made the main character sound throughout the whole book. I just feel like it was a wasted effort... it was exceptionally slow and too convoluted.

Robert Tremblay
Comically racist, as well as dated. Nowdays, given the current political climate, categorically unreadable.