Interpreted Languages and Compositionality

ยท Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 89๊ถŒ ยท Springer Science & Business Media
eBook
214
ํŽ˜์ด์ง€
๊ฒ€์ฆ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ํ‰์ ๊ณผ ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ย ์ž์„ธํžˆ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ

eBook ์ •๋ณด

This book argues that languages are composed of sets of โ€˜signsโ€™, rather than โ€˜stringsโ€™. This notion, first posited by de Saussure in the early 20th century, has for decades been neglected by linguists, particularly following Chomskyโ€™s heavy critiques of the 1950s. Yet since the emergence of formal semantics in the 1970s, the issue of compositionality has gained traction in the theoretical debate, becoming a selling point for linguistic theories.

Yet the concept of โ€˜compositionalityโ€™ itself remains ill-defined, an issue this book addresses. Positioning compositionality as a cornerstone in linguistic theory, it argues that, contrary to widely held beliefs, there exist non-compositional languages, which shows that the concept of compositionality has empirical content. The author asserts that the existence of syntactic structure can flow from the fact that a compositional grammar cannot be delivered without prior agreement on the syntactic structure of the constituents.

์ด eBook ํ‰๊ฐ€

์˜๊ฒฌ์„ ์•Œ๋ ค์ฃผ์„ธ์š”.

์ฝ๊ธฐ ์ •๋ณด

์Šค๋งˆํŠธํฐ ๋ฐ ํƒœ๋ธ”๋ฆฟ
Android ๋ฐ iPad/iPhone์šฉ Google Play ๋ถ ์•ฑ์„ ์„ค์น˜ํ•˜์„ธ์š”. ๊ณ„์ •๊ณผ ์ž๋™์œผ๋กœ ๋™๊ธฐํ™”๋˜์–ด ์–ด๋””์„œ๋‚˜ ์˜จ๋ผ์ธ ๋˜๋Š” ์˜คํ”„๋ผ์ธ์œผ๋กœ ์ฑ…์„ ์ฝ์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๋…ธํŠธ๋ถ ๋ฐ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ
์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ์˜ ์›น๋ธŒ๋ผ์šฐ์ €๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ Google Play์—์„œ ๊ตฌ๋งคํ•œ ์˜ค๋””์˜ค๋ถ์„ ๋“ค์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
eReader ๋ฐ ๊ธฐํƒ€ ๊ธฐ๊ธฐ
Kobo eReader ๋“ฑ์˜ eBook ๋ฆฌ๋”๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์ฝ์œผ๋ ค๋ฉด ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ๋‹ค์šด๋กœ๋“œํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ๊ธฐ๋กœ ์ „์†กํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ง€์›๋˜๋Š” eBook ๋ฆฌ๋”๊ธฐ๋กœ ํŒŒ์ผ์„ ์ „์†กํ•˜๋ ค๋ฉด ๊ณ ๊ฐ์„ผํ„ฐ์—์„œ ์ž์„ธํ•œ ์•ˆ๋‚ด๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ฅด์„ธ์š”.