Exploring Crash-Proof Grammars
Michael T. Putnam
2010๋
9์ ยท Language Faculty and Beyond 3๊ถ ยท John Benjamins Publishing
eBook
301
ํ์ด์ง
report๊ฒ์ฆ๋์ง ์์ ํ์ ๊ณผ ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ์
๋๋ค. ย ์์ธํ ์์๋ณด๊ธฐ
eBook ์ ๋ณด
The Minimalist Program has advanced a research program that builds the design of human language from conceptual necessity. Seminal proposals by Frampton & Gutmann (1999, 2000, 2002) introduced the notion that an ideal syntactic theory should be ยcrash-proofย. Such a version of the Minimalist Program (or any other linguistic theory) would not permit syntactic operations to produce structures that ยcrashย. There have, however, been some recent developments in Minimalism ย especially those that approach linguistic theory from a biolinguistic perspective (cf. Chomsky 2005 et seq.) ย that have called the pursuit of a ยcrash-proof grammarย into serious question. The papers in this volume take on the daunting challenge of defining exactly what a ยcrashย is and what a ยcrash-proof grammarย would look like, and of investigating whether or not the pursuit of a ยcrash-proof grammarย is biolinguistically appealing.
์ด eBook ํ๊ฐ
์๊ฒฌ์ ์๋ ค์ฃผ์ธ์.
์ฝ๊ธฐ ์ ๋ณด
์ค๋งํธํฐ ๋ฐ ํ๋ธ๋ฆฟ
Android ๋ฐ iPad/iPhone์ฉ Google Play ๋ถ ์ฑ์ ์ค์นํ์ธ์. ๊ณ์ ๊ณผ ์๋์ผ๋ก ๋๊ธฐํ๋์ด ์ด๋์๋ ์จ๋ผ์ธ ๋๋ ์คํ๋ผ์ธ์ผ๋ก ์ฑ
์ ์ฝ์ ์ ์์ต๋๋ค.
๋
ธํธ๋ถ ๋ฐ ์ปดํจํฐ
์ปดํจํฐ์ ์น๋ธ๋ผ์ฐ์ ๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํ์ฌ Google Play์์ ๊ตฌ๋งคํ ์ค๋์ค๋ถ์ ๋ค์ ์ ์์ต๋๋ค.
eReader ๋ฐ ๊ธฐํ ๊ธฐ๊ธฐ
Kobo eReader ๋ฑ์ eBook ๋ฆฌ๋๊ธฐ์์ ์ฝ์ผ๋ ค๋ฉด ํ์ผ์ ๋ค์ด๋ก๋ํ์ฌ ๊ธฐ๊ธฐ๋ก ์ ์กํด์ผ ํฉ๋๋ค. ์ง์๋๋ eBook ๋ฆฌ๋๊ธฐ๋ก ํ์ผ์ ์ ์กํ๋ ค๋ฉด ๊ณ ๊ฐ์ผํฐ์์ ์์ธํ ์๋ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐ๋ฅด์ธ์.
