Dracula and Philosophy: Dying to Know
Nicolas Michaud · Janelle Pötzsch
ກ.ລ. 2015 · Popular Culture and Philosophy ຫົວທີ 90 · Open Court
ປຶ້ມອີບຸກ
288
ໜ້າ
family_home
ມີສິດ
info
reportບໍ່ໄດ້ຢັ້ງຢືນການຈັດອັນດັບ ແລະ ຄຳຕິຊົມ ສຶກສາເພີ່ມເຕີມ
ກ່ຽວກັບປຶ້ມ e-book ນີ້
Twenty-four nocturnal philosophers stake out and vivisect Dracula from many angles, unearthing evidence from numerous movies and shows—macabre, terrifying, tragic, and comic.
Altmann decides whether Dracula can really be blamed for his crimes, since it’s his nature as a vampire to behave a certain way. Arp argues that Dracula’s addiction to live human blood dooms him to perpetual misery. Karavitis sees Dracula as a Randian individual pitted against the Marxist collective. Ketcham contrives a meeting between Dracula and the Jewish theologian Maimonides. Littmann maintains that if we disapprove of Dracula’s behavior, we ought to be vegetarians. Mahon uses the example of Dracula to resolve nagging problems about the desirability of immortality. McCrossin and Wolfe, disinter some of the re-interpretations of this now-mythical character, and asks whether we can identify an essential Dracula. Pramik shows how the Dracula tale embodies Kierkegaard’s three stages of life. Barkman and Versteeg ponder what it would really feel like to be Dracula. The Greens publish some previous unknown letters between Dracula and Camus's Meursault. Vuckovich looks at the sexual morality of characters in the Dracula saga. De Waal explains that "Dragula" is scary because every time this being appears, it causes "gender trouble."
Altmann decides whether Dracula can really be blamed for his crimes, since it’s his nature as a vampire to behave a certain way. Arp argues that Dracula’s addiction to live human blood dooms him to perpetual misery. Karavitis sees Dracula as a Randian individual pitted against the Marxist collective. Ketcham contrives a meeting between Dracula and the Jewish theologian Maimonides. Littmann maintains that if we disapprove of Dracula’s behavior, we ought to be vegetarians. Mahon uses the example of Dracula to resolve nagging problems about the desirability of immortality. McCrossin and Wolfe, disinter some of the re-interpretations of this now-mythical character, and asks whether we can identify an essential Dracula. Pramik shows how the Dracula tale embodies Kierkegaard’s three stages of life. Barkman and Versteeg ponder what it would really feel like to be Dracula. The Greens publish some previous unknown letters between Dracula and Camus's Meursault. Vuckovich looks at the sexual morality of characters in the Dracula saga. De Waal explains that "Dragula" is scary because every time this being appears, it causes "gender trouble."
ກ່ຽວກັບຜູ້ຂຽນ
Nicolas Michaud: Nicolas Michaud is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Florida State College Jacksonville. He is the editor of Jurassic Park and Philosophy (2014), Frankenstein and Philosophy (2013), and Hunger Games and Philosophy (2012). Dr. Michaud regularly appears on WJCT Jacksonville radio discussing film and philosophy.
Janelle Pötzsch: Dr. Janelle Pötzsch holds a doctorate in philosophy from Ruhr-Universität Bochum and currently works as a research assistant at the Institut für Philosophie.
Janelle Pötzsch: Dr. Janelle Pötzsch holds a doctorate in philosophy from Ruhr-Universität Bochum and currently works as a research assistant at the Institut für Philosophie.
ໃຫ້ຄະແນນ e-book ນີ້
ບອກພວກເຮົາວ່າທ່ານຄິດແນວໃດ.
ອ່ານຂໍ້ມູນຂ່າວສານ
ສະມາດໂຟນ ແລະ ແທັບເລັດ
ຕິດຕັ້ງ ແອັບ Google Play Books ສຳລັບ Android ແລະ iPad/iPhone. ມັນຊິ້ງຂໍ້ມູນໂດຍອັດຕະໂນມັດກັບບັນຊີຂອງທ່ານ ແລະ ອະນຸຍາດໃຫ້ທ່ານອ່ານທາງອອນລາຍ ຫຼື ແບບອອບລາຍໄດ້ ບໍ່ວ່າທ່ານຈະຢູ່ໃສ.
ແລັບທັອບ ແລະ ຄອມພິວເຕີ
ທ່ານສາມາດຟັງປຶ້ມສຽງທີ່ຊື້ໃນ Google Play ໂດຍໃຊ້ໂປຣແກຣມທ່ອງເວັບຂອງຄອມພິວເຕີຂອງທ່ານໄດ້.
eReaders ແລະອຸປະກອນອື່ນໆ
ເພື່ອອ່ານໃນອຸປະກອນ e-ink ເຊັ່ນ: Kobo eReader, ທ່ານຈຳເປັນຕ້ອງດາວໂຫຼດໄຟລ໌ ແລະ ໂອນຍ້າຍມັນໄປໃສ່ອຸປະກອນຂອງທ່ານກ່ອນ. ປະຕິບັດຕາມຄຳແນະນຳລະອຽດຂອງ ສູນຊ່ວຍເຫຼືອ ເພື່ອໂອນຍ້າຍໄຟລ໌ໄໃສ່ eReader ທີ່ຮອງຮັບ.
