Coercion: A Nonevaluative Approach

┬╖ Value Inquiry Book Series рдкреБрд╕реНрддрдХ 92 ┬╖ Rodopi
рдИ-рдмреБрдХ
193
рдкреЗрдЬ
рдпреЛрдЧреНрдп
рд░реЗрдЯрд┐рдВрдЧ рдФрд░ рд╕рдореАрдХреНрд╖рд╛рдУрдВ рдХреА рдкреБрд╖реНрдЯрд┐ рдирд╣реАрдВ рд╣реБрдИ рд╣реИ ┬ардЬрд╝реНрдпрд╛рджрд╛ рдЬрд╛рдиреЗрдВ

рдЗрд╕ рдИ-рдмреБрдХ рдХреЗ рдмрд╛рд░реЗ рдореЗрдВ рдЬрд╛рдирдХрд╛рд░реА

In this book, Rhodes provides a nonevaluative account of coercion. He begins with a thorough discussion of the charge that coercion is an essentially contested concept. He argues that effective communication of regulations pertaining to human conduct requires a basic level of clarity as to the kind of conduct being regulated. Accordingly, he argues that before we prescribe or proscribe conduct, we should describe it. In short, he maintains that wherever possible description should precede prescription and proscription. Rhodes begins his descriptive project by providing a fundamental account of human motivation. Upon this foundation he supports his distinctions between threats, offers, throffers, and neutral proposals. He argues that all coercion claims can be understood in light of these components. He applies this analysis to three prominent accounts of coercion as advanced by F.A. Hayek, Harry Frankfurt, and Robert Nozick. After comparing and contrasting these views, Rhodes provides his own account. Rhodes's account is based upon the identification of what he refers to as perceived-threat-avoidance-behavior as a necessary condition for coercion.As a descriptive, or nonevaluative, account, Rhodes is able to identify coercion independent from normative judgments. He argues that it is not the wrongfulness of some conduct that makes it coercion, instead, it is the coerciveness of some conduct that makes it wrong. Unique to Rhodes's account, coercion is not necessarily wrong. As a descriptive account, his view permits an independent analysis of the moral status of an act of coercion. The book concludes with a discussion of the normatively significant variables of a coercion claim.

рд▓реЗрдЦрдХ рдХреЗ рдмрд╛рд░реЗ рдореЗрдВ

Michael R. Rhodes received his Ph.D. in Philosophy from the State University of New York at Buffalo in 1994, and he is currently seeking a law degree at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. He has taught, lectured, and published in the areas of Social and Political Philosophy, and Medical Ethics.

рдЗрд╕ рдИ-рдмреБрдХ рдХреЛ рд░реЗрдЯрд┐рдВрдЧ рджреЗрдВ

рд╣рдореЗрдВ рдЕрдкрдиреА рд░рд╛рдп рдмрддрд╛рдПрдВ.

рдкрдарди рдЬрд╛рдирдХрд╛рд░реА

рд╕реНрдорд╛рд░реНрдЯрдлрд╝реЛрди рдФрд░ рдЯреИрдмрд▓реЗрдЯ
Android рдФрд░ iPad/iPhone рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП Google Play рдХрд┐рддрд╛рдмреЗрдВ рдРрдкреНрд▓рд┐рдХреЗрд╢рди рдЗрдВрд╕реНрдЯреЙрд▓ рдХрд░реЗрдВ. рдпрд╣ рдЖрдкрдХреЗ рдЦрд╛рддреЗ рдХреЗ рд╕рд╛рде рдЕрдкрдиреЗ рдЖрдк рд╕рд┐рдВрдХ рд╣реЛ рдЬрд╛рддрд╛ рд╣реИ рдФрд░ рдЖрдкрдХреЛ рдХрд╣реАрдВ рднреА рдСрдирд▓рд╛рдЗрди рдпрд╛ рдСрдлрд╝рд▓рд╛рдЗрди рдкрдврд╝рдиреЗ рдХреА рд╕реБрд╡рд┐рдзрд╛ рджреЗрддрд╛ рд╣реИ.
рд▓реИрдкрдЯреЙрдк рдФрд░ рдХрдВрдкреНрдпреВрдЯрд░
рдЖрдк рдЕрдкрдиреЗ рдХрдВрдкреНрдпреВрдЯрд░ рдХреЗ рд╡реЗрдм рдмреНрд░рд╛рдЙрдЬрд╝рд░ рдХрд╛ рдЙрдкрдпреЛрдЧ рдХрд░рдХреЗ Google Play рдкрд░ рдЦрд░реАрджреА рдЧрдИ рдСрдбрд┐рдпреЛ рдХрд┐рддрд╛рдмреЗрдВ рд╕реБрди рд╕рдХрддреЗ рд╣реИрдВ.
eReaders рдФрд░ рдЕрдиреНрдп рдбрд┐рд╡рд╛рдЗрд╕
Kobo рдИ-рд░реАрдбрд░ рдЬреИрд╕реА рдИ-рдЗрдВрдХ рдбрд┐рд╡рд╛рдЗрд╕реЛрдВ рдкрд░ рдХреБрдЫ рдкрдврд╝рдиреЗ рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП, рдЖрдкрдХреЛ рдлрд╝рд╛рдЗрд▓ рдбрд╛рдЙрдирд▓реЛрдб рдХрд░рдХреЗ рдЙрд╕реЗ рдЕрдкрдиреЗ рдбрд┐рд╡рд╛рдЗрд╕ рдкрд░ рдЯреНрд░рд╛рдВрд╕рдлрд╝рд░ рдХрд░рдирд╛ рд╣реЛрдЧрд╛. рдИ-рд░реАрдбрд░ рдкрд░ рдХрд╛рдо рдХрд░рдиреЗ рд╡рд╛рд▓реА рдлрд╝рд╛рдЗрд▓реЛрдВ рдХреЛ рдИ-рд░реАрдбрд░ рдкрд░ рдЯреНрд░рд╛рдВрд╕рдлрд╝рд░ рдХрд░рдиреЗ рдХреЗ рд▓рд┐рдП, рд╕рд╣рд╛рдпрддрд╛ рдХреЗрдВрджреНрд░ рдХреЗ рдирд┐рд░реНрджреЗрд╢реЛрдВ рдХрд╛ рдкрд╛рд▓рди рдХрд░реЗрдВ.