The Collapse of Constitutional Remedies
Aziz Z. Huq
ธ.ค. 2021 · RB Media · บรรยายโดย Pete Bradbury
headphones
หนังสือเสียง
5 ชม. 36 นาที
ฉบับสมบูรณ์
family_home
มีสิทธิ์
info
reportคะแนนและรีวิวไม่ได้รับการตรวจสอบยืนยัน ดูข้อมูลเพิ่มเติม
ฟังตัวอย่างระยะเวลา 33 นาที ได้ทุกเมื่อแม้ขณะออฟไลน์
เพิ่ม
เกี่ยวกับหนังสือเสียงเล่มนี้
For years, the Supreme Court has turned a deaf ear to arguments that police officers should not be shielded by the legal doctrine of “qualified immunity” when they shoot or brutalize innocent civilians. “Qualified immunity” is just one of
several rules invented by judges that stop the vindication of basic rights. But aren’t courts supposed to be protectors of individual rights? In The Collapse of Constitutional Remedies, Aziz Z. Huq recounts a far more fraught history in which
the link between the Constitution’s system of independent courts and the protection of constitutional rights has always been tenuous.
Federal courts have created many legal concepts such as “qualified immunity” that may seem abstract, but inflict real-world harms: A bureaucrat fires her employee for testifying in a legal proceeding involving the boss’s family. Police
officers set a dog on a homeless man, leaving him severely wounded. A Mexican teenager is shot in the back at the US border—and dies. In all these cases, defendants walk away with minor or no penalties. Their victims had rights—but
no remedies thanks to rules created by federal judges.
A powerful historical account of how courts have carved a gap between rights and remedies, this book will reshape our understanding of why it’s so difficult to hold the American state to the rule of law.
several rules invented by judges that stop the vindication of basic rights. But aren’t courts supposed to be protectors of individual rights? In The Collapse of Constitutional Remedies, Aziz Z. Huq recounts a far more fraught history in which
the link between the Constitution’s system of independent courts and the protection of constitutional rights has always been tenuous.
Federal courts have created many legal concepts such as “qualified immunity” that may seem abstract, but inflict real-world harms: A bureaucrat fires her employee for testifying in a legal proceeding involving the boss’s family. Police
officers set a dog on a homeless man, leaving him severely wounded. A Mexican teenager is shot in the back at the US border—and dies. In all these cases, defendants walk away with minor or no penalties. Their victims had rights—but
no remedies thanks to rules created by federal judges.
A powerful historical account of how courts have carved a gap between rights and remedies, this book will reshape our understanding of why it’s so difficult to hold the American state to the rule of law.
ให้คะแนนหนังสือเสียงนี้
แสดงความเห็นของคุณให้เรารับรู้
ข้อมูลการฟัง
สมาร์ทโฟนและแท็บเล็ต
ติดตั้งแอป Google Play Books สำหรับ Android และ iPad/iPhone แอปจะซิงค์โดยอัตโนมัติกับบัญชีของคุณ และช่วยให้คุณอ่านแบบออนไลน์หรือออฟไลน์ได้ทุกที่
แล็ปท็อปและคอมพิวเตอร์
คุณสามารถอ่านหนังสือที่ซื้อจาก Google Play โดยใช้เว็บเบราว์เซอร์บนคอมพิวเตอร์ของคุณ
