The Collapse of Constitutional Remedies
Aziz Z. Huq
āŠĄāŠŋāŠļāŦ 2021 · RB Media · Pete Bradbury āŠĶāŦāŠĩāŠūāŠ°āŠū āŠĩāŠ°āŦāŠĢāŠĻ āŠāŠ°āŦāŠē
headphones
āŠāŠĄāŠŋāŠŊāŦāŠŽāŦāŠ
5 āŠāŠēāŠūāŠ 36 āŠŪāŠŋāŠĻāŠŋāŠ
āŠĩāŠŋāŠļāŦāŠĪāŦāŠĪ
family_home
āŠŠāŠūāŠĪāŦāŠ°
info
reportāŠ°āŦāŠāŠŋāŠāŠ āŠ
āŠĻāŦ āŠ°āŠŋāŠĩāŦāŠŊāŦ āŠāŠāŠūāŠļāŦāŠēāŠū āŠĻāŠĨāŦ āŠĩāŠ§āŦ āŠāŠūāŠĢāŦ
33 āŠŪāŠŋāŠĻāŠŋāŠāŠĻāŦ āŠĻāŠŪāŦāŠĻāŦ āŠāŦāŠāŠ āŠāŦ? āŠāŠŦāŠēāŠūāŠāŠĻ āŠđāŦ, āŠĪāŦāŠŊāŠūāŠ°āŦ āŠŠāŠĢ āŠāŠŪāŦ āŠĪāŦāŠŊāŠūāŠ°āŦ āŠļāŠūāŠāŠāŠģāŦ.Â
āŠāŠŪāŦāŠ°āŦ
āŠ āŠāŠĄāŠŋāŠŊāŦāŠŽāŦāŠ āŠĩāŠŋāŠķāŦ
For years, the Supreme Court has turned a deaf ear to arguments that police officers should not be shielded by the legal doctrine of âqualified immunityâ when they shoot or brutalize innocent civilians. âQualified immunityâ is just one of
several rules invented by judges that stop the vindication of basic rights. But arenât courts supposed to be protectors of individual rights? In The Collapse of Constitutional Remedies, Aziz Z. Huq recounts a far more fraught history in which
the link between the Constitutionâs system of independent courts and the protection of constitutional rights has always been tenuous.
Federal courts have created many legal concepts such as âqualified immunityâ that may seem abstract, but inflict real-world harms: A bureaucrat fires her employee for testifying in a legal proceeding involving the bossâs family. Police
officers set a dog on a homeless man, leaving him severely wounded. A Mexican teenager is shot in the back at the US borderâand dies. In all these cases, defendants walk away with minor or no penalties. Their victims had rightsâbut
no remedies thanks to rules created by federal judges.
A powerful historical account of how courts have carved a gap between rights and remedies, this book will reshape our understanding of why itâs so difficult to hold the American state to the rule of law.
several rules invented by judges that stop the vindication of basic rights. But arenât courts supposed to be protectors of individual rights? In The Collapse of Constitutional Remedies, Aziz Z. Huq recounts a far more fraught history in which
the link between the Constitutionâs system of independent courts and the protection of constitutional rights has always been tenuous.
Federal courts have created many legal concepts such as âqualified immunityâ that may seem abstract, but inflict real-world harms: A bureaucrat fires her employee for testifying in a legal proceeding involving the bossâs family. Police
officers set a dog on a homeless man, leaving him severely wounded. A Mexican teenager is shot in the back at the US borderâand dies. In all these cases, defendants walk away with minor or no penalties. Their victims had rightsâbut
no remedies thanks to rules created by federal judges.
A powerful historical account of how courts have carved a gap between rights and remedies, this book will reshape our understanding of why itâs so difficult to hold the American state to the rule of law.
āŠ āŠāŠĄāŠŋāŠŊāŦāŠŽāŦāŠāŠĻāŦ āŠ°āŦāŠāŠŋāŠāŠ āŠāŠŠāŦ
āŠĪāŠŪāŦ āŠķāŦāŠ āŠĩāŠŋāŠāŠūāŠ°āŦ āŠāŦ āŠ
āŠŪāŠĻāŦ āŠāŠĢāŠūāŠĩāŦ.
āŠļāŠūāŠāŠāŠģāŠĩāŠū āŠĩāŠŋāŠķāŦāŠĻāŦ āŠŪāŠūāŠđāŠŋāŠĪāŦ
āŠļāŦāŠŪāŠūāŠ°āŦāŠāŠŦāŦāŠĻ āŠ
āŠĻāŦ āŠāŦ
āŠŽāŦāŠēāŦāŠ
Android āŠ
āŠĻāŦ iPad/iPhone āŠŪāŠūāŠāŦ Google Play Books āŠāŠŠ āŠāŠĻāŦāŠļāŦāŠāŦāŠē āŠāŠ°āŦ. āŠĪāŦ āŠĪāŠŪāŠūāŠ°āŠū āŠāŠāŠūāŠāŠĻāŦāŠ āŠļāŠūāŠĨāŦ āŠāŠāŦāŠŪāŦ
āŠāŠŋāŠ āŠ°āŦāŠĪāŦ āŠļāŠŋāŠāŠ āŠĨāŠūāŠŊ āŠāŦ āŠ
āŠĻāŦ āŠĪāŠŪāŠĻāŦ āŠāŦāŠŊāŠūāŠ āŠŠāŠĢ āŠđāŦ āŠĪāŦāŠŊāŠūāŠ āŠĪāŠŪāŠĻāŦ āŠāŠĻāŠēāŠūāŠāŠĻ āŠ
āŠĨāŠĩāŠū āŠāŠŦāŠēāŠūāŠāŠĻ āŠĩāŠūāŠāŠāŠĩāŠūāŠĻāŦ āŠŪāŠāŠāŦāŠ°āŦ āŠāŠŠāŦ āŠāŦ.
āŠēāŦ
āŠŠāŠāŦāŠŠ āŠ
āŠĻāŦ āŠāŠŪāŦāŠŠāŦāŠŊāŦāŠāŠ°
āŠĪāŠŪāŦ āŠĪāŠŪāŠūāŠ° āŠāŠŪāŦāŠŠāŦāŠŊāŦāŠāŠ°āŠĻāŠū āŠĩāŦāŠŽ āŠŽāŦāŠ°āŠūāŠāŠāŠ°āŠĻāŦ āŠāŠŠāŠŊāŦāŠ āŠāŠ°āŦāŠĻāŦ Google Play āŠŠāŠ° āŠāŠ°āŦāŠĶāŦāŠēāŦ āŠŠāŦāŠļāŦāŠĪāŠāŦāŠĻāŦ āŠĩāŠūāŠāŠāŦ āŠķāŠāŦ āŠāŦ.
